Are BlackBerry providing full, plain and true disclosure to shareholders?

Last updated:

The BlackBerry Q3 financial report made the August disaster look good. Sales of devices to end users of 4.3 million did not all make it into revenue despite the August change in accounting policy to recognize sales only when the devices were sold to end users. The August report was at its highest misleading.

In its September 27, 2013 release of the August 31, 2013 quarterly results, the company reported that:

“During the second quarter the company recognized hardware revenue on approximately 3.7 million BlackBerry smartphones. Most of the units recognized are BlackBerry 7 devices, in part because certain BlackBerry 10 devices that were shipped in the second quarter of fiscal 2014 will not be recognized until those devices are sold through to end customers. During the quarter, approximately 5.9 million BlackBerry smartphones were sold through to end customers, which included shipments made prior to the second quarter and which reduced the Company’s inventory in the channel.”

In the accompanying financial statements, BlackBerry reported:

Report 1

You could reasonably conclude that sales of BlackBerry 10 devices would only be recognized when those devices were sold through to end users.

Fast forward to the December 20, 2013 report for the quarter ended November 30, 2013.

Report 2

So, BlackBerry sold 4.3 million devices to end users in the November quarter and recognized only 1.9 million of them as revenues. What happened to the other 2.4 million devices?

Apparently, they were recognized in revenues before the end of the August 31, 2013 quarter. When? Why?

It cannot be a policy to recognize revenues when BB10 devices are sold through to end users and then go ahead and recognize revenues from 2.4 million such devices that have not been sold through to end users.

There may be some technical explanation as to why this is the case. But investors are entitled to better than an after-the-fact technical explanation (which they have yet to receive) on key items like revenues from more devices sold and not recognized than were sold and were recognized.

How will the arms length buyers of the $1 billion debentures react to this disclosure?

How will the board of directors and audit committee deal with this from a governance perspective. Are they satisfied the company is providing full, plain and true disclosure to shareholders?

It’s guaranteed that the class action bar will have a field day with this!

[signoff predefined=”Enjoy this?” icon=”icon-users”][/signoff]Via

Rapid Mobile

Rapid Mobile uses cookies, tokens, and other third party scripts to recognise visitors of our sites and services, remember your settings and privacy choices, and - depending on your settings and privacy choices - enable us and some key partners to collect information about you so that we can improve our services and deliver relevant ads.


By continuing to use our site or clicking I Accept, you agree that Rapid Mobile and our key partners may collect data and use cookies for personalised ads and other purposes, as described more fully in our privacy policy.


You can change your settings at any time by clicking Manage Settings or by visiting our Privacy Centre for more detailed information.


Privacy Settings saved!
Cookie Services

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies.Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources, so we can measure and improve the performance of our site.

We track anonymized user information to improve our website.
  • _ga
  • _gid
  • _gat

Decline all Services
Accept all Services